Flying Pig Spotted: Rangel, Pelosi, CONDEMN CHAVEZ'S ATTACK ON BUSH


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 August
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July

My Links
Global Warming: A Chilling Perspective
Watts Up With That?
Internet Haganah
Jihad Watch
Ponder the Maunder
The Dissident Frogman
Barking-Moonbat EWS
Just Barking Mad!
The Malaria Clock
Project Valour-IT
Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...
10 Myths of Islam

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Get Firefox!

Tell me when this blog is updated

what is this?


Click to Read


hacker emblem






Flying Pig Spotted: Rangel, Pelosi, CONDEMN CHAVEZ'S ATTACK ON BUSH
09.21.06 (12:09 pm)   [edit]

Whoa!

Things must be getting wild in the Fever Swamps for THIS to happen. 

From Congressman Rangel's site:

<blockquote>

WASHINGTON - I want to express my extreme displeasure with statements by the President of Venezuela attacking U.S. President George Bush in such a personal and disparaging way during his remarks at the United Nations General Assembly.

It  should be clear to all heads of government that criticism of Bush Administration policies, either domestic or foreign, does not entitle them to attack the President personally.

George Bush is the President of the United States and represents the entire country. Any demeaning public attack against him is viewed by Republicans and Democrats, and all Americans, as an attack on all of us.

I feel that I must speak out now since the Venezuelan government has been instrumental in providing oil at discounted prices to people in low income communities who have suffered increases in rent as heating oil prices have risen sharply.  By offering this benefit to people in need, Venezuela has won many friends in poor communities of New York and other states.  I am surprised that American oil companies have not stepped up to provide that kind of assistance to the poor.

Venezuela's generosity to the poor, however, should not be interpreted as license to attack President Bush.  Those who take issue with Bush Administration policies have no right to attack him personally.  It was not helpful when President Bush referred to certain nations as an "axis of evil."  Neither is it helpful for a head of state to use the sacred halls of the United Nations to insult President Bush.</blockquote>

And from Rep. Pelosi:

<blockquote>WASHING TON (Reuters) - One of President George W. Bush's fiercest political opponents at home took his side on Thursday, calling Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez a "thug" for his remark that Bush is like the devil.

"Hugo Chavez fancies himself a modern day Simon Bolivar but all he is an everyday thug," House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said at a news conference, referring to Chavez' comments in a U.N. General Assembly speech on Wednesday.

"Hugo Chavez abused the privilege that he had, speaking at the United Nations," said Pelosi, a frequent Bush critic. "He demeaned himself and he demeaned Venezuela."

Simon Bolivar led the fight for independence against Spanish rule in several South American countries in the early 19th century and is cited by Chavez as a political model.

Chavez, a vociferous critic of Bush and the United States, has allied himself with U.S. opponents Cuba and Iran and has led a resurgence of left-wing populism in Latin America.</blockquote>

 Gonna get interesting in the next few months...

 


posted by: akelso (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (11:07 am)

Hmmmm, yes Chavez was truly "over the top," you think? Still, he only swung back verbally at the military aggression mounted by the Bush administration, in exactly the spirit of that violence: Axis of Evil!! Evildoers!! A Crusade!!!

Bush and Chavez are well-matched for there inaiblity to bring civility to the table. Chavez expressed the moral outrage of people without a voice at the U.N. - Bush has appalled and humiliated this great nation beyond our likely ability to recover any time soon.

Neither win a place at the table of civility, I fear, but Bush is the most dangerous man on earth.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (1:13 pm)

You forgot to shriek "Haliburton," and "Global Warming!"

You Bush Derangement Syndrome sufferers are getting so desparate, it's almost comical. Seen any gulags in your part of the country yet? Take a deep breath, and maybe a tad of lithium...

Do a little research on how Chavez came to power, huh? Sakes.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (1:46 pm)

akelso: Rickety Straw Man, BTW.

"The Republicans and “red” America appear to be able to maintain great respect for the values that delivered this country into the 21st Century, arguably, the most powerful and benevolent empire the world has ever seen; despite our turbulent and ugly past.

It appears that Democratic politicians and “left” leaning voters possess a guilty conscious about the path our Nation took to the 21st Century, and thus are uncomfortable with American supremacy; perhaps thinking/feeling that America is not deserving of the vanguard role it plays on the world stage and espousing its values as synonymous with “universal” values

I wonder, how are the past atrocities that America committed in the name of Manifest Destiny, its participation in Slavery, its reluctance to embrace emancipation, its well intentioned, but tragically misguided effort in Vietnam, any more vile than;

• 16th through 19th Century history of the Western European Monarchies
• French and German lack of racial and ethnic diversity in modern times
• China’s long history of human rights abuses
• The oppressive regimes of all Middle Eastern Totalitarian Dynasties
• Czarist, Stalinist, or Putins’ Russia

Is seems by comparison, that at the dawn of the 21st Century, the United States stands alone as a Nation that allows for both the full expression of human freedom while successfully assimilating all races, religions and genders into its society.

Republican politicians and “red” American voters seem to have a profound appreciation of our nation being the only in recorded history to be founded on an “idea”, with its expression finding a sacrosanct home in the Declaration of Independence. I suspect those supportive of Bush’s foreign policy think and feel that this country has lived up to that founding ideal, and therefore can be an example to all nations; in other words, we have become, that “City on a Hill”

The politicians and voters on the “left” appear to be mired in seeing what’s wrong with America, more than seeing what’s right, and thus find themselves turning away from joining the fight to win the global WOT; there also appears to be an all consuming “2000 Election” temper tantrum that manifests in sophomoric demagogic exhortations geared toward reclaiming the White House.

I wish these shenanigans could fall innocently into the historical bin of political self flagellation and rabid partisanship. The vituperative journalism of 1789 demonstrates that political nastiness is indigenous to our Republic; the stakes were high; so thus too was the rhetoric; however, in that era, the cycle of war amongst Nations was quite regular, and despite the horror of those wars, none of the great military powers faced extinction as a result of their never ending declarations of war.

Today, we face a starkly different paradigm.

“Toto…we’re not in Kansas anymore” could be the literary equivalent of the global economy and weapons capability of the 18th Century compared to the petrodollars that fund global terrorism in the 21st Century, and the nexus between terrorists’ interest in obtaining WMD, and their financial interlocutors."

douglas-from-nyc, Via Free Republic.



posted by: irishred (reply)
post date: 09.21.06 (4:03 pm)

I couldn't agree with you more...it should be very interesting.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 09.22.06 (1:37 pm)

Reply to: akelso

BTW, here are a few edicts issued 10 days ago by the man you deem less evil than President Bush:

Article 147: "Anyone who offends with his words or in writing or in any other way disrespects the President of the Republic or whomever is fulfilling his duties will be punished with prison of 6 to 30 months if the offense is serious and half of that if it is light." That sanction, the code implies, applies to those who "disrespect" the president or his functionaries in private; "the term will be increased by a third if the offense is made publicly."

There's more: Article 444 says that comments that "expose another person to contempt or public hatred" can bring a prison sentence of one to three years; Article 297a says that someone who "causes public panic or anxiety" with inaccurate reports can receive five years. Prosecutors are authorized to track down allegedly criminal inaccuracies not only in newspapers and electronic media, but also in e-mail and telephone communications.

Guess who? Hugo!

Please read something other than the Daily Kos and Democratic Underground.




posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 09.23.06 (7:21 am)

I saw that you had been back Audry. What? No refutation?

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Locations of visitors to this page





 Use OpenOffice.org

My computer geek score is greater than 100% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!




Get this widget!