Court of Appeals takes up Corrie lawsuit


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 October
2008 September
2008 August
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July

My Links
Global Warming: A Chilling Perspective
Watts Up With That?
Internet Haganah
Jihad Watch
Ponder the Maunder
The Dissident Frogman
Barking-Moonbat EWS
Just Barking Mad!
The Malaria Clock
Project Valour-IT
Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...
10 Myths of Islam

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Get Firefox!

Tell me when this blog is updated

what is this?


Click to Read


hacker emblem






Court of Appeals takes up Corrie lawsuit
07.09.07 (1:31 pm)   [edit]

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear arguments Monday whether there is merit to a lawsuit by the family of Rachel Corrie, the 23-year-old activist from Olympia killed by a bulldozer in the Gaza Strip in 2003.

The defendant in the case is Caterpillar, which made the D9 bulldozer involved in her death.

The case, Corrie et al. v. Caterpillar, was filed in Seattle in 2005, but a district court dismissed it. After this hearing, the appeals court will rule whether the suit should be dismissed or sent back to the lower court.

Cindy and Craig Corrie, the woman's parents, allege Caterpillar violated human rights and committed war crimes by knowingly selling its equipment to the Israeli army, which used the bulldozers to raze Palestinian homes and endanger people. Rachel Corrie was run over by a bulldozer driven by an Israeli soldier as she tried to block a home from demolition.

"We are essentially arguing that you cannot knowingly provide substantial assistance — the means to commit war crimes, which is essentially what Caterpillar has done here," said Maria LaHood, with the Center for Constitutional Rights, on the Corries' legal team.

Israel said the death was an accident, according to The Associated Press. Caterpillar has said in the past that it can't be held responsible for how its bulldozers are used.

On Friday, a Caterpillar spokeswoman declined to comment on the development.

The Corries seek monetary damages in the civil suit, and they want to stop Caterpillar from selling its products to groups they say violate human rights. Four Palestinian families whose homes were bulldozed are also plaintiffs.

"We hope that this decision would mean eventually that Caterpillar shouldn't sell D9 bulldozers to Israel while they are using them to commit human-rights violations," LaHood said.

The death of The Evergreen State College student polarized political camps about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This is not the first time corporations have been tried or held liable for their involvement in alleged human-rights violations or war crimes, LaHood said.

Three judges will hear arguments, and a ruling could take a few months, LaHood said.

Roxana Popescu: 206-464-2112 or rpopescu@seattletimes.com

Lest we forget. How she's portrayed:

Rachel

 

How she REALLY was:

rachel-corrie-flag-02

 


posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 07.24.07 (10:27 pm)

And as expected, not a effing peep from the left on this.



posted by: PastorDave (reply)
post date: 07.25.07 (7:13 am)

9th Circuit...that would be San Francisco, I think? Caterpillar is in trouble. Thank goodness for a relatively sensible Supreme Court, thanks to George Bush.

If you stand in front of a bulldozer, then you take responsibility for the consequences. That makes sense.



posted by: fractalmom (reply)
post date: 08.15.07 (12:43 pm)

sadly, Americans, when in other countries, tend to assume (wrongly) that we will enjoy the same protections that we have in the U.S. insofar as speaking to protection of life and limb, freedom to assemble, freedom of speech. While laudatory to go to another country to protest on behalf of someone whom you believe to be oppressed, one should never put oneself in the path of imminent danger if you are not ready and willing to die for such protest. Perhaps she was, but obviously didn't talk it over with her parents.

I do not believe Caterpillar has any culpability whatsoever.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 08.28.07 (1:08 am)

Reply to: fractalmom

Thank you for a rational and thoughtful reply. I DO appreciate it. For the record, her parents are certifiable leftist moonbats. I can provide additional info if you would like... :)




posted by: fractalmom (reply)
post date: 08.28.07 (6:55 am)

Reply to: thoolou

you know, i do feel badly for her parents. to lose a child is a horrid thing, regardless of the age of the child, even for moonbats. but, that being said, moonbats REALLY irritate the hell out of me :::grin::::

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Locations of visitors to this page





 Use OpenOffice.org

My computer geek score is greater than 100% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!




Get this widget!