Cooler Heads


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July

My Links
Global Warming: A Chilling Perspective
Watts Up With That?
Internet Haganah
Jihad Watch
Ponder the Maunder
The Dissident Frogman
Barking-Moonbat EWS
Just Barking Mad!
The Malaria Clock
Project Valour-IT
Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...
10 Myths of Islam

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Get Firefox!

Tell me when this blog is updated

what is this?


Click to Read


hacker emblem






Cooler Heads
05.20.08 (10:35 am)   [edit]

Climate Change: Nearly 32,000 scientists sign a petition that says they reject the claim that humanity is causing global warming. The media, who are heavily invested in the Gore Consensus, yawn.

But a British royal, no scientist he, says we have 18 months to save the rain forests or we will face a climate disaster, and the media are fascinated.

That same royal, Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, has also said that the fight against global warming is much like the war his predecessors fought against the Nazis.

He noted in a cleverly timed May 1 speech at a climate summit that when he served "in the Royal Navy . . . 'mayday, mayday, mayday' was the distress call used in cases of emergencies.

"And this (human-caused global warming) is an emergency that we face."

Al Gore, naturally, gets the same reverential treatment. He's no scientist, but the media dutifully report all the crackpot statements he makes about climate change, including his assertion that the deadly cyclone in Burma was likely due to global warming.

It's bunk, of course. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, in a newly released study, says that warming will actually cause fewer hurricanes, not more.

Not that Gore will heed the rebuke. He's been told before, by none other than William Gray, professor emeritus of the atmospheric department at Colorado State University who is known as the country's most reliable hurricane forecaster, that such claims are false.

Yet he sticks to his story. And the media stick to him.

Meanwhile, Arthur Robinson of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine released Monday at the Press Club in Washington a petition signed by 31,072 Americans with university degrees in science, including 9,021 with doctorates, who reject the notion that greenhouse gas emissions will cause catastrophic heating of the planet.

Didn't hear about it? Oh, that's right — the media can't be bothered to report on something that challenges their narrative. They're too busy saving the world from imagined risks and ignoring the real threats we all share.

IBD
 

 

 


posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 05.21.08 (4:48 pm)

Ah... Just thought I'd check in after seeing you on tblurt. I see you're still an idiot. At least you're dependable! Hope you're well.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 05.22.08 (3:49 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

And I see you still refute arguments with personal attacks.

I'm very well, thank you. My best to you and your family.



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 05.22.08 (5:26 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

Nah, no more a personal attack on you than you level against everyone you disagree with. The difference is, I do it honestly and directly and TRY not to couch it in badly worded sarcasm.

I noticed something a few posts back. You listed a whole bunch of different "scientific" theories on why global warming is a hoax, all concocted by different people, none of whom agreed with each other. Seemingly, it went right over your head. The fact that they didn't believe it was good enough for you. So what if all their reasons contradicted each other. They disagreed with Al Gore. That was the only important thing to you. It's funny. Tens of thousands of scientists agree that it's a real, but very possibly manageable problem, and just about all of them agree to the extent of the problems and why they're occurring. Some disagree. They all have their own theories, and it's very difficult to get very many of them to get anyone else on board with any of the dissenting ideas. I know. Everyone's gullible but you.




posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (3:05 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

"I noticed something a few posts back. You listed a whole bunch of different "scientific" theories on why global warming is a hoax, all concocted by different people, none of whom agreed with each other. Seemingly, it went right over your head."

No, but YOU seem to have missed the point. There is no true "consensus" on either side. Thanks for proving my point. Science by consensus is not science. Several hundred years ago the consensus was the earth was flat. It has been proven that the models the AGW alarmists are flouting are seriously flawed. Did you know that not one of them includes the most prevalent green-house gas in our atmosphere? Do you even know what it is?

"Tens of thousands of scientists agree that it's a real, but very possibly manageable problem, and just about all of them agree to the extent of the problems and why they're occurring."

Tens of thousands. Like the nearly 32,000 that call shenanigans on AGW? Jesus man, do some research. Even the IPCC has admitted their data were off. Significantly. If you'd read my posts instead of automatically spewing vitriol, maybe you could make an informed opinion.

Did you even LOOK at the one that broke down the absorption spectra of IR by atmospheric component? CO2 ain't even a major player...




posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (5:00 pm)

"No, but YOU seem to have missed the point. There is no true "consensus" on either side. Thanks for proving my point."

Oh, so now THAT was the point you were making. Uh huh.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (5:02 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

Typical "Progressive."



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (5:04 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

"Oh, so now THAT was the point you were making. Uh huh."

Yes it is. I can't help it if you don't get it.

And you STILL can't provide a valid argument. Asshole.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (5:05 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

Typical "Progressive."



posted by: surrogate (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (6:00 pm)

Reply to: thoolou

And somehow you got Lori on board with your foolishness? Man, I find that depressing.



posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (6:09 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

Lori comments on her own. I somemtimes talk to her.

Paranoid much?




posted by: thoolou (reply)
post date: 05.28.08 (6:10 pm)

Reply to: surrogate

God you are an ass.

Your Name:


Your Comment:


Locations of visitors to this page





 Use OpenOffice.org

My computer geek score is greater than 100% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!




Get this widget!