| Cooler Heads |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2007 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2006 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July My Links Global Warming: A Chilling Perspective Watts Up With That? Internet Haganah Jihad Watch Ponder the Maunder The Dissident Frogman Barking-Moonbat EWS Just Barking Mad! The Malaria Clock Project Valour-IT Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD... 10 Myths of Islam tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog
|
posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 05.21.08 (4:48 pm) Ah... Just thought I'd check in after seeing you on tblurt. I see you're still an idiot. At least you're dependable! Hope you're well. posted by: thoolou (reply) post date: 05.22.08 (3:49 pm) Reply to: surrogate And I see you still refute arguments with personal attacks. I'm very well, thank you. My best to you and your family. posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 05.22.08 (5:26 pm) Reply to: surrogate Nah, no more a personal attack on you than you level against everyone you disagree with. The difference is, I do it honestly and directly and TRY not to couch it in badly worded sarcasm. I noticed something a few posts back. You listed a whole bunch of different "scientific" theories on why global warming is a hoax, all concocted by different people, none of whom agreed with each other. Seemingly, it went right over your head. The fact that they didn't believe it was good enough for you. So what if all their reasons contradicted each other. They disagreed with Al Gore. That was the only important thing to you. It's funny. Tens of thousands of scientists agree that it's a real, but very possibly manageable problem, and just about all of them agree to the extent of the problems and why they're occurring. Some disagree. They all have their own theories, and it's very difficult to get very many of them to get anyone else on board with any of the dissenting ideas. I know. Everyone's gullible but you. posted by: thoolou (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (3:05 pm) Reply to: surrogate "I noticed something a few posts back. You listed a whole bunch of different "scientific" theories on why global warming is a hoax, all concocted by different people, none of whom agreed with each other. Seemingly, it went right over your head." No, but YOU seem to have missed the point. There is no true "consensus" on either side. Thanks for proving my point. Science by consensus is not science. Several hundred years ago the consensus was the earth was flat. It has been proven that the models the AGW alarmists are flouting are seriously flawed. Did you know that not one of them includes the most prevalent green-house gas in our atmosphere? Do you even know what it is? "Tens of thousands of scientists agree that it's a real, but very possibly manageable problem, and just about all of them agree to the extent of the problems and why they're occurring." Tens of thousands. Like the nearly 32,000 that call shenanigans on AGW? Jesus man, do some research. Even the IPCC has admitted their data were off. Significantly. If you'd read my posts instead of automatically spewing vitriol, maybe you could make an informed opinion. Did you even LOOK at the one that broke down the absorption spectra of IR by atmospheric component? CO2 ain't even a major player... posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (5:00 pm) "No, but YOU seem to have missed the point. There is no true "consensus" on either side. Thanks for proving my point." Oh, so now THAT was the point you were making. Uh huh. posted by: thoolou (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (5:02 pm) Reply to: surrogate Typical "Progressive." posted by: thoolou (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (5:04 pm) Reply to: surrogate "Oh, so now THAT was the point you were making. Uh huh." Yes it is. I can't help it if you don't get it. And you STILL can't provide a valid argument. Asshole. posted by: thoolou (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (5:05 pm) Reply to: surrogate Typical "Progressive." posted by: surrogate (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (6:00 pm) Reply to: thoolou And somehow you got Lori on board with your foolishness? Man, I find that depressing. posted by: thoolou (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (6:09 pm) Reply to: surrogate Lori comments on her own. I somemtimes talk to her. Paranoid much? posted by: thoolou (reply) post date: 05.28.08 (6:10 pm) Reply to: surrogate God you are an ass. |
![]() |