Senate 'Obamacare' Concept Costs $829 Billion


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2009 December
2009 November
2009 October
2009 September
2009 August
2009 July
2009 June
2009 May
2009 April
2009 March
2009 February
2009 January
2008 December
2008 November
2008 October
2008 September
2008 August
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July

My Links
The Racist History of the Democratic Party
Global Warming: A Chilling Perspective
Internet Haganah
Watts Up With That?
Jihad Watch
Ponder the Maunder
The Dissident Frogman
Barking-Moonbat EWS
Just Barking Mad!
The Malaria Clock
Project Valour-IT
Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...
10 Myths of Islam

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Get 

Firefox!

Tell me when this blog is updated

what is this?


Click to Read


hacker emblem

/plg.swf?go=46VLG3802B085L3" />
Senate 'Obamacare' Concept Costs $829 Billion
10.08.09 (4:18 pm)   [edit]
Yesterday, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reported that the Obamacare bill still being drafted by the Senate Finance Committee will cost a whopping $829 billion dollars while leaving over 25 million people still uninsured by 2019.  

The President claimed in his speech to the joint session of Congress that 30 million citizens were uninsured. That means Democrats want to spend $829 billion dollars to insure 5 million American citizens over the next 10 years. With the government running health care, that’s about as accurate a cost estimate as you’re ever likely to see.

The Finance Committee bill, being engineered by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), is still unfinished. The “bill” scored by CBO is not the bill that Congress would vote on.  It’s a concept with amendments.  
Click here to visit our sponsor



CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf has stated on several occasions that an accurate CBO scores requires legislative language.  But CBO didn’t have it to do an accurate score on the Baucus draft.  So how reliable is this cost estimate?  And how much of a burden will it be on the economy?

According to this new CBO score, the Baucus concept draft contains $506 billion in new taxes and over a half-trillion in cuts to Medicare, Medicare Advantage and Medicaid while moving millions more to the Medicaid rolls.  The CBO score also claims that the draft is budget-neutral. Right.

Should this concept draft pass out of committee, it still has to be merged with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee partial bill passed earlier this year which contains a robust government-run health care option and, like the Senate Finance concept, does not bar federal funding of abortion nor does it require proof of citizenship when enrolling for government-run health care coverage.

The legislative language will be written when these two bills merge.  All sorts of things will be inserted that are not part of the CBO cost estimate score.  Democrat Senate leadership says Republicans will be shut out of this bill-writing process.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, ranking Republican on the Senate Committee on Finance, says hard working American families will foot the bill to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars.
    & nbsp;   &n bsp;   
“I worry that some of my colleagues will focus only on the deficit-neutral piece of CBO’s document,” Grassley said.  “A celebration of the deficit effects masks who pays the bills.  This package includes hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes and fees.  Most Americans with health insurance will see their premiums increase.”  

He added, “Uninsured individuals would pay a tax for not obtaining government-approved health insurance.  Employers who already offer health insurance would face a penalty if their workers choose subsidy-eligible insurance.  With all of this, the bill spends nearly a $1 trillion and still leaves 25 million people without health insurance.  That's not much bang for the buck”

Absolute, outright, theft by the Fed.

Human Events

0 Comments
 
Your Name:


Your Comment:


Locations of visitors to this page





 Use OpenOffice.org

My computer geek score is greater than 100% of all people in the world! How do you compare? Click here to find out!

I am nerdier than 99% of all people. Are you a nerd? Click here to take the Nerd Test, get geeky images and jokes, and write on the nerd forum!




Click to get your own widget