Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2008 July
2008 June
2008 May
2008 April
2008 March
2008 February
2008 January
2007 December
2007 November
2007 October
2007 September
2007 July
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
My Links
Global Warming: A Chilling Perspective
Watts Up With That?
Internet Haganah
Jihad Watch
Ponder the Maunder
The Dissident Frogman
Barking-Moonbat EWS
Just Barking Mad!
The Malaria Clock
Project Valour-IT
Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...
10 Myths of Islam
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
| Which privileges for Islam? |
| 03.15.05 (9:06 am) [edit] |
|
By Daniel Pipes http://www.JewishWorldReview.com" title="http://www.JewishWorldReview.com" target="_blank"http://www.JewishWorldReview.... | Throughout the West, Muslims are making new and assertive demands, and in some cases challenging the very premises of European and North American life. How to respond? Here is a general rule: Offer full rights — but turn down demands for special privileges. By way of example, note two current Canadian controversies. The first concerns the establishment of voluntary Shar'i (Islamic law) courts in Ontario. This idea is promoted by the usual Islamist groups, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Canada and the Canadian Islamic Congress. It is most prominently opposed by Muslim women's groups, led by Homa Arjomand, who fear that the Islamic courts, despite their voluntary nature, will be used to repress women's rights. I oppose any role for the Shari'a, a medieval law, in public life today, but so long as women are truly not coerced (create an ombudsman to ensure this?) and Islamic rulings remain subordinate to Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I see no grounds on which to deny Muslims the right, like other Canadians, to revert to private arbitration. On the other hand, Muslim demands for an exclusive prayer room at McGill University in Montreal are outrageous and unacceptable. As a secular institution, the university on principle does not provide any religious group with a permanent place of worship on campus. Despite this universal policy, the Muslim Student Association, a part of the Wahhabi lobby, insists on just such a place, even threatening a human rights abuse filing if it is defied. McGill must stand firm. The key distinction is whether Muslim aspirations fit into an existing framework or not. Where they do, they can be accommodated, such as in the case of: * Schools and universities closing for the Eid al-Adha holidays. * Male employees permitted to wear beards in New Jersey. * The founding of an Islamic cemetery in Tennessee. Adherents of other minority religions may get a holiday off, wear beards, or dispose of their dead in private burial grounds — so why not Muslims? In contrast, special privileges for Islam and Muslims are unacceptable, such as: * Setting up a government advisory board uniquely for Muslims in the United States. * Permitting Muslim-only living quarters or events in the United States and Great Britain. * Setting aside women-only bathing at a municipal swimming pool in France. * Banning Hindus and Jews from a jury hearing a case about an Islamist in Great Britain. * Changing noise laws to broadcast the adhan (call to prayer) in Hamtramck, Michigan. * Allowing a prisoner the unheard-of right to avoid strip-searches in New York State. * Exploiting taxpayer-funded schools and airwaves to convert non-Muslims in the United States. * Allowing students in taxpayer-funded schools to use empty classrooms for prayers in New Jersey. * Deeming the "religious vilification" of Islam to be illegal in Australia. * Punishing anti-Islamic views with court-mandated indoctrination by an Islamist in Canada. * Prohibiting families from sending pork or pork by-products to U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq. * Requiring that female American soldiers in Saudi Arabia wear U.S. government-issued abayas. * Applying the "Rushdie rules" — or letting Muslims shut down criticism of Islam and Muslims. Go read the rest. Via: Jewish World Review |
posted by: Marleen (reply)
post date: 03.26.06 (5:09 pm)
Must have really Gotcha
